|CrossRef Text and Data Mining|
|Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.|
|Body Surface Area Is Not a Reliable Predictor of Tracheal Tube Size in Children|
|Filiz Uzumcugil, Emre Can Celebioglu, Demet Basak Ozkaragoz, Aysun Ankay Yilbas, Basak Akca, Nazgol Lotfinagsh, Bilge Celebioglu|
|Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. 2018;11(4):301-308. Published online 2018 August 25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2018.00178|
Body Surface Area Is Not a Reliable Predictor of Tracheal Tube Size in Children
Choice of tracheal tube size for children: finger size or age-related formula?
How reliable is length-based determination of body weight and tracheal tube size in the paediatric age group? The Broselow tape reconsidered
A case of thoracic pneumatosis due to severe coughs and tracheal tube displacement induced by tracheal tube size mismatch
The size of tracheal tube connectors
Size matters: choosing the right tracheal tube
A weight-based formula for tracheal tube size in children
Evaluation of cuffed tracheal tube size predicted using the Khine formula in children
Evaluation of a new recommendation for improved cuffed tracheal tube size selection in infants and small children
Does body mass index predict tracheal airway size?
|This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since March 1, 2015.|